In recent weeks, the media have reported incidents that at first glance may appear isolated— a suspicious parcel reported by an employee, an artillery round brought to a police station, or the evacuation of a building following a bomb threat.
In close protection, one mistake recurs: treating visible presence as proof of protection. Someone stays very close to the protectee, adopts an intimidating posture, issues unnecessary commands and repeatedly signals readiness to intervene.
On 18 November, representatives of Global Protection Group took part in the fifth edition of T-Mobile Security Day, acting as speakers and sharing practical experience in […]
We are proud to announce that Global Protection Group has been granted License No. B-055/2025 by the Polish Ministry of the Interior and Administration (MSWiA), authorizing […]
Counter-surveillance measures are still frequently associated with clandestine government operations or scenes from spy thrillers. However, in the realities of today’s business environment—particularly across Central and […]
Attempted Assassination of Rheinmetall CEO: Implications for Executive Security Strategy The recent confirmation of assassination attempts targeting Armin Papperger, CEO of German defense manufacturer Rheinmetall, […]